Abstract

This article explores the role of national holidays in shaping cultural identity in England and Kyrgyzstan. Holidays preserve historical memory, transmit values, and strengthen social cohesion. English holidays emphasize historical continuity and institutional authority, while Kyrgyz holidays focus on communal unity and harmony with nature. The study highlights the adaptability of cultural identity amid globalization.

Keywords

Suggested citation

Zhoroeva, G., & Ergasheva, А. (2026). THE ROLE OF NATIONAL HOLIDAYS IN SHAPING CULTURAL IDENTITY. Global Scholars’ Space, 4(1), 55-64.

References

  1. Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Smith, A. D. (2010). Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History. Polity Press.
  3. Fox, J. E., & Miller-Idriss, C. (2014). Everyday Nationhood. Ethnicities, 14(4), 536–563.
  4. Edensor, T. (2015). National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life. Bloomsbury.
  5. Alexander, J. C. (2012). Trauma: A Social Theory. Polity Press.
  6. Kirmayer, L. J., et al. (2014). Culture and Mental Health. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(4), 438–514.
  7. Brubaker, R. (2011). Nationalizing States Revisited. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(11), 1785–1814.
  8. Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (2012). The Invention of Tradition (New edition). Cambridge University Press.
  9. Eriksen, T. H. (2015). Small Places, Large Issues. Pluto Press.
  10. Zanca, R. (2011). Islam, Memory and Identity in Central Asia. Central Asian Survey, 30(3), 343–357.
  11. Louw, M. (2013). Globalization, Identity and Ritual in Central Asia. Religion, State and Society, 41(1), 27–45.
  12. Nazarov, B., & Kambaralieva, A. (2021). Cultural Heritage and National Identity in Kyrgyzstan. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 12(2), 134–145.